說不定是RAM的正印打錯了,2.0ns的mark成1.6ns的~~~~~Originally posted by layer+Jul 20 2004, 11:32 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (layer @ Jul 20 2004, 11:32 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-shihwolf@Jul 20 2004, 11:25 AM
看來青雲還以為這批還是2.0ns的=.= :ph34r:
呵呵呵...小弟覺得是陰謀論啦....Originally posted by wind211+Jul 20 2004, 11:52 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (wind211 @ Jul 20 2004, 11:52 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by layer@Jul 20 2004, 11:32 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-shihwolf@Jul 20 2004, 11:25 AM
看來青雲還以為這批還是2.0ns的=.= :ph34r:
說不定是RAM的正印打錯了,2.0ns的mark成1.6ns的~~~~~![]()
:ph34r: 你想太多了....1.6ns的才是正式的版本.......Originally posted by king1124+Jul 20 2004, 12:03 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (king1124 @ Jul 20 2004, 12:03 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
呵呵呵...小弟覺得是陰謀論啦....
說不定是故意用1.6ns的勒
打響知名度....
過不久就全部回歸正常啦.....
有人測產品中後期嗎....
呵呵呵...一個都沒有...
看他1.6ns能用多久....
廠商就是這樣(不少).... :凸:
