RAM參數的設定與比較

[coolaler]

Originally posted by jamesfuh@Dec 23 2003, 09:07 PM
Super Pi 32M當然結果立判...5-2-2-2效能技高一籌

問題就在為何Super Pi 1M時...11-2-2-2的組合能快一秒
在世界級競賽時...讓OS + 11-2-2-2設定組合...豈不很容易四捨五入...Ya Pee!
leonlianing的決勝Barton 2500+ Super Pi 39sec...不正是11-2-2-2如此來的! ^__^

找出來!
http://www.coolaler.com/ipb/index.php?show...wtopic=4391&hl=

http://forum.pcdvd.com.tw/showthread.php?s...6%D1K7%A8t%A6C3

1流的測試 :lol:
可是小弟反覆測試5-2-2-2與11-2-2-2的1M測試
10次中有9次2者平手
1次是5-2-2-2比較快 ;)
另外
並不是每一塊MOBO都支援11-2-2-2的 選項
尤其是世界級的競賽中高手們的MOBO

 

[jamesfuh]

Additonal infomation :

http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=getarticl...cle&articID=133
11-2-2-2...Make it!

http://forum.pcdvd.com.tw/showthread.php?s...threadid=287553
qouted by...

 

[Lii]

這真是一篇精采的討論!!!

統整如下:
1. 請按我一(可惜連結已經找不到)

2. 請按我二(可惜連結已經找不到)

3. 請按我三

 

[雲姬]

Originally posted by 狂少@Dec 23 2003, 10:38 AM
多謝lawlawman兄資料!
以其作者之意:
"My original theory that it was because it was a dual-channel board and was using two sticks of RAM, it needed a higher tRAS latency to read all the data off of the Row, was disproved when the same results came up running in single channel mode, with one or two sticks. So as to why this happens, I am stumped. If anybody has any theories, please feel free to contact me, I would love to hear them."

很明顯是雙通道架構是比較需要設TRAS來最佳化系統效能!
作者也提出他的友人在Kt400上, TRAS的設定效能似乎毫無感覺!


給大家參考!

KT400...用起來感覺效能比起KT333還差 :( ...