[圖多]Mobile Barton 2600+配NF7S2.0極限詳測

[司]

"用心測就是好測試! 沒啥丟不丟臉的!" 真訴至理名言
等小弟我有空拍好照在post上來,到時請大大們賞光並且批評一下哪裡需要改進的 :)

對了~狂大, 您這顆Mobile Barton 2600+ 是在Newegg買的嗎?
怎麼會是綠色版本的? 我看到的好像是褐色的耶.
難道有分新舊版本嗎?

先謝謝您的回答

 

[狂少]

Originally posted by 司@Apr 8 2004, 12:26 AM
"用心測就是好測試! 沒啥丟不丟臉的!" 真訴至理名言
等小弟我有空拍好照在post上來,到時請大大們賞光並且批評一下哪裡需要改進的 :)

對了~狂大, 您這顆Mobile Barton 2600+ 是在Newegg買的嗎?
怎麼會是綠色版本的? 我看到的好像是褐色的耶.
難道有分新舊版本嗎?

先謝謝您的回答

應該只是PCB配色差異,是在Newegg買的沒錯!
我今天收到時參照ocforum的database時,再看到蠻不漂亮的serial...
臉都綠了..
結果還是師父C大的觀晶大法正確... :lol:

您在US嗎?

 

[Colt357TW]

just realize you are using Mach2, thought you were using LCO2 for your cooling. Do you happened to know how much your total electricity consumption on your current setup?

 

[狂少]

Originally posted by Colt357TW@Apr 8 2004, 12:35 AM
just realize you are using Mach2, thought you were using LCO2 for your cooling. Do you happened to know how much your total electricity consumption on your current setup?

I think Mach II is not that power-consuming monster, isn't it?
Well, I've never heard about what the LCO2 is.
Some sentences from your post are not really coherent; for instance, like "Do you happened to know"...
If you can perfectly type "Big-5 code" you might wanna just go ahead and type it.
Don't have to challenge my English writing ability!
I appreciate your understanding!

 

[waterwater]

Originally posted by 狂少+Apr 8 2004, 11:11 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (狂少 @ Apr 8 2004, 11:11 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-overclocker@Apr 7 2004, 09:27 PM
狂兄~~我要看 cpu mark la.....

來!我的壞習慣!都忘記CPUMARK :lkl:

**米國買CPU沒得挑,一切都是天意(某人說的)

**這顆就算空冷(我試過)也能1.625v跑2450mhz左右


**BL721兄:是連跑都不能跑!
我懷疑是NF7S的原因!BIOS沒辦法認!都變成5x100 default [/b][/quote]
天意不會是我說的吧 |||
反正我沒啥天意可言
2500+去找你的時候,跟你差一天買的,結果爆爛~還外加降價咧
1700+也是差沒多久~一樣不怎麼樣 :MMM:
不買mobile 2600+了
現在1700+用用就好

 

[mmshu]

哇~~~長江後浪,推前浪...前浪死在沙灘上.....之前那顆將軍可以安息了.....

阿彌陀佛~~ :lol:

 

[ozyamazaki]

每次看狂大的測試都熱血沸騰~~~~ :SSS:

只怪口袋裡的小朋友實在是太少嚕 :OPP: :MMM:

 

[司]

狂大, 我突然記得我在OC Forums還是 Xtreme那曾經看到他們在討論有關mobile Barton的FSB 問題. (mobile版的FSB=266, 普通desktop版的FSB=333, 記得好像是這樣, 不對的話請糾正我)
有些人建議是說最好做所謂的L12 Mod, 這樣才可以讓本來規格只有FSB=266的mobile barton,再超頻時會上的了比較高的FSB. 這只是小弟在網路上看到的, 實際的理論為何, 那時沒有深入的去細讀, 也閉O道聽塗說, 但是給你做個參考, 希望有所幫助.

Cathar好像也跟你有一樣的困擾,上不去高的FSB. 煩請你去這看看說不定可以找出原因 :D
http://forums.overclockers.com.au/showthre...15&pagenumber=1

 

[Colt357TW]

Originally posted by 狂少+Apr 8 2004, 01:43 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (狂少 @ Apr 8 2004, 01:43 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Colt357TW@Apr 8 2004, 12:35 AM
just realize you are using Mach2, thought you were using LCO2 for your cooling. Do you happened to know how much your total electricity consumption on your current setup?

I think Mach II is not that power-consuming monster, isn't it?
Well, I've never heard about what the LCO2 is.
Some sentences from your post are not really coherent; for instance, like "Do you happened to know"...
If you can perfectly type "Big-5 code" you might wanna just go ahead and type it.
Don't have to challenge my English writing ability!
I appreciate your understanding! [/b][/quote]
抱歉啦 我中文是用注音一個個打 回台練了3年還是打的很慢
對"笑ㄟ"一詞 我一直把它當成是 不被常規, 環境, 與傳統觀念所桎梏的人 我自己在MSN的nick上就用了 如果這句對您有所冒犯 還請海涵

 

[狂少]

Originally posted by 司@Apr 8 2004, 01:57 AM
狂大, 我突然記得我在OC Forums還是 Xtreme那曾經看到他們在討論有關mobile Barton的FSB 問題. (mobile版的FSB=266, 普通desktop版的FSB=333, 記得好像是這樣, 不對的話請糾正我)
有些人建議是說最好做所謂的L12 Mod, 這樣才可以讓本來規格只有FSB=266的mobile barton,再超頻時會上的了比較高的FSB. 這只是小弟在網路上看到的, 實際的理論為何, 那時沒有深入的去細讀, 也閉O道聽塗說, 但是給你做個參考, 希望有所幫助.

Cathar好像也跟你有一樣的困擾,上不去高的FSB. 煩請你去這看看說不定可以找出原因 :D
http://forums.overclockers.com.au/showthre...15&pagenumber=1

那連結要註冊才看的到!
昨天已和水大討論過!的確如此!
感謝您!