a0911430500
進階會員
- 已加入
- 11/17/06
- 訊息
- 412
- 互動分數
- 0
- 點數
- 0
放棄了,我表明在硬件應用上6C/12T平台後就不會再追了,一時間更萌生退意....而且
總覺得我Upgrade了8C/16T之後Stanford又會把Bigadv入場下限調至10C/20T......
變成高分包只適合多路CPU 或大型計算中心能跑
大概是單核心個人電腦為參與F@H瘋狂超頻,爆掉未算完的計算包會影響整個計畫吧
放棄了,我表明在硬件應用上6C/12T平台後就不會再追了,一時間更萌生退意....而且
總覺得我Upgrade了8C/16T之後Stanford又會把Bigadv入場下限調至10C/20T......
BA很重視時效性,bonus門檻算是低標準,即使能低空飛過也未必是理想的BA運算平台.變成高分包只適合多路CPU 或大型計算中心能跑
大概是單核心個人電腦為參與F@H瘋狂超頻,爆掉未算完的計算包會影響整個計畫吧
變成高分包只適合多路CPU 或大型計算中心能跑
大概是單核心個人電腦為參與F@H瘋狂超頻,爆掉未算完的計算包會影響整個計畫吧
如果能給每個WU整理出benchmark,大概可以知道自己的配備跑不跑的到deadline,可以避免造成垃圾計算包。
會不會我們都太在意分數而忘記運算本來的意義了;ranger;
不對,我的意思是指,比如說你硬體super pi要跑出幾分,才有法算完某個WU這樣的統計方式,這樣預知而避免吃到吃不下的。
等到知道TPF時,你WU都給他接下去了。
i7-980@4.2G 6C/12T 模擬 16T 以原生Linux 1.3.4 image跑P8101
結果一樣殘念,TPF約38分 ;em42;
[11:22:04] *------------------------------*
[11:22:04] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[11:22:04] Version 2.27 (Thu Feb 10 09:46:40 PST 2011)
[11:22:04]
[11:22:04] Preparing to commence simulation
[11:22:04] - Looking at optimizations...
[11:22:04] - Created dyn
[11:22:04] - Files status OK
[11:22:06] - Expanded 30311544 -> 33158016 (decompressed 109.3 percent)
[11:22:06] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=30311544 data_size=33158016, decompressed_data_size=33158016 diff=0
[11:22:06] - Digital signature verified
[11:22:06]
[11:22:06] Project: 8101 (Run 0, Clone 10, Gen 22)
[11:22:06]
[11:22:06] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[11:22:06] Entering M.D.
[11:22:12] Mapping NT from 12 to 12
[11:22:17] Completed 0 out of 250000 steps (0%)
[12:01:02] Completed 2500 out of 250000 steps (1%)
[12:39:47] Completed 5000 out of 250000 steps (2%)
[12:47:53] - Autosending finished units... [August 8 12:47:53 UTC]
[12:47:53] Trying to send all finished work units
[12:47:53] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[12:47:53] - Autosend completed
[13:18:29] Completed 7500 out of 250000 steps (3%)
[13:57:14] Completed 10000 out of 250000 steps (4%)
[14:35:56] Completed 12500 out of 250000 steps (5%)
[15:14:39] Completed 15000 out of 250000 steps (6%)
[15:53:24] Completed 17500 out of 250000 steps (7%)
[16:32:05] Completed 20000 out of 250000 steps (8%)
[17:10:49] Completed 22500 out of 250000 steps (9%)
[17:49:30] Completed 25000 out of 250000 steps (10%)
by kasson » Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:19 pm
Thanks, everyone, for testing 8102. The good news and the bad news is that we will adjust points to bring them in line with 6901, 6902, 6905, 6906, 8101. So by all means enjoy a points bump in our initial stages of release, but please do be aware that it may not last.