看了不少板上先進們的測試,想說該貢獻一點心力了! :lkl:
以下測試將針對4dimmBH-5與2dimmBH-5的效能做比較,並看看超頻與不超頻的狀態下有無差別。
請各位網友笑納!
CPU:P4 2.4CG(A715) VCORE:auto
CPU COOLER:SP-94 + 9*9風扇
M/B :ASUS P4C800-E DLX BIOS:1016
MEM :A-data 256mb BH-5*4 + 512mb BH-5*2
VGA :Albatron Ti4800SE
HDD :Hitachi SATA 7K250*2 (raid0)
POWER: Seasonic 400W
OS :WIN XP PRO SP1
首先比較不超頻時,2 dimm 256mb BH-5、4 dimm 256mb BH-5及2 dimm 512mb BH-5跑super pi 1M、2M及PCMark2002的成績。
2.4G + 2 dimm 256mb BH-5(performance mode=turbo , performance acceleration mode=enabled )
2.4G + 4 dimm 256mb BH-5(performance mode=turbo , performance acceleration mode=enabled )
2.4G + 2 dimm 512mb BH-5(performance mode=turbo , performance acceleration mode=enabled )
以上看來,不超頻時的效能是 2 dimm 512mb BH-5 > 2 dimm 256mb BH-5 > 4 dimm 256mb BH-5
以下測試將針對4dimmBH-5與2dimmBH-5的效能做比較,並看看超頻與不超頻的狀態下有無差別。
請各位網友笑納!
CPU:P4 2.4CG(A715) VCORE:auto
CPU COOLER:SP-94 + 9*9風扇
M/B :ASUS P4C800-E DLX BIOS:1016
MEM :A-data 256mb BH-5*4 + 512mb BH-5*2
VGA :Albatron Ti4800SE
HDD :Hitachi SATA 7K250*2 (raid0)
POWER: Seasonic 400W
OS :WIN XP PRO SP1
首先比較不超頻時,2 dimm 256mb BH-5、4 dimm 256mb BH-5及2 dimm 512mb BH-5跑super pi 1M、2M及PCMark2002的成績。
2.4G + 2 dimm 256mb BH-5(performance mode=turbo , performance acceleration mode=enabled )
2.4G + 4 dimm 256mb BH-5(performance mode=turbo , performance acceleration mode=enabled )
2.4G + 2 dimm 512mb BH-5(performance mode=turbo , performance acceleration mode=enabled )
以上看來,不超頻時的效能是 2 dimm 512mb BH-5 > 2 dimm 256mb BH-5 > 4 dimm 256mb BH-5