- 已加入
- 1/12/05
- 訊息
- 4,395
- 互動分數
- 0
- 點數
- 0
- 年齡
- 45
http://www.iamxtreme.com/
我的網站 嘻嘻~當然每一次的測試都會貼在CBB給大家
CPU MARK
HIGHER IS BETTER
As we expect, T7400 is better than T2600 at same speed. Even 2.9G T7400 out perform T2600 3G. We believe the gap between two CPU is about 200MHz.
SUPER PI 32M
LOWER IS BETTER
We see under same speed, T7400 is about faster then T2600 about 40sec. As we increases the FSB, the performance gain for T7400 is much better than T2600.
3DMark01
HIGHER IS BETTER
1024 X 768
3Dmark01 is very depending on CPU graphical calculation power. It clears shows T2600 under 3G is slower than T7400 on 2.6G.
3DMark03
HIGHER IS BETTER
1024 X 768
3Dmark03 always very depends on CPU graphical power too. However, it also stresses CPU more than any other kind of FutureMark products. The weird thing is T7400 likes 3Dmark03 very much. Even 2.16G over perform T2600 at 3G.
3DMark05
HIGHER IS BETTER
1024 X 768
3Dmark05 is more depending on the video card but still relate to the processing speed of CPU. The result closer to 3Dmark01 and super pi 32M. T7400 out perform T2600 under same speed even T7400 is 400MHz slower.
3DMark06
HIGHER IS BETTER
1280 X 1024 32Bit
Same thing happens in 3Dmark06 also. But this time T2600 at 3G is better than T7400 at 2.6G, but it is only about 60 point more for 400MHz difference. For their default speed is about 100point difference.
Sandra CPU Arithmetic Benchmark
HIGHER IS BETTER
Now we probably knows why 2.6G T7400 can out perform 3G T2600. T7400 at 2.6G score of ALU and iSSE2 is much faster than T2600 at 3G
Sandra CPU Multi-Media Benchmark
HIGHER IS BETTER
Well, from this we can tell that under multi-media bench, the result is about the same as we see as other benchmarks.
Cinebench CPU Benchmark
HIGHER IS BETTER
Another benchmarks back up our thought, when FSB increases, the gap gets larger between T7400 and T2600! At default speed, only about 9 point different between each. However as FSB and bus speed increases, the Merom like the unleash monster, it gets even 60 points compare with 2.9G T7400 and 3G T2600
F.E.A.R Benchmark*
HIGHER IS BETTER
1152 X 864, FSAA 4X, Anisotropic 16X
FARCRY Benchmark**
HIGHER IS BETTER
1280 X 1024, D3D encode, Antialising 8X, AF 16X
Quake4 Benchmark***
HIGHER IS BETTER
1280 X 1024, Ultra Quality, Anisotropic 16X, Antialising 4X, SMP enable
*F.E.A.R Benchmark using its build in test run
**FarCry Benchmark Downloaded Guru3D (Here)
***Q4 Benchmark Downloaded Guru3D (Here)
我的網站 嘻嘻~當然每一次的測試都會貼在CBB給大家
CPU MARK
HIGHER IS BETTER
As we expect, T7400 is better than T2600 at same speed. Even 2.9G T7400 out perform T2600 3G. We believe the gap between two CPU is about 200MHz.
SUPER PI 32M
LOWER IS BETTER
We see under same speed, T7400 is about faster then T2600 about 40sec. As we increases the FSB, the performance gain for T7400 is much better than T2600.
3DMark01
HIGHER IS BETTER
1024 X 768
3Dmark01 is very depending on CPU graphical calculation power. It clears shows T2600 under 3G is slower than T7400 on 2.6G.
3DMark03
HIGHER IS BETTER
1024 X 768
3Dmark03 always very depends on CPU graphical power too. However, it also stresses CPU more than any other kind of FutureMark products. The weird thing is T7400 likes 3Dmark03 very much. Even 2.16G over perform T2600 at 3G.
3DMark05
HIGHER IS BETTER
1024 X 768
3Dmark05 is more depending on the video card but still relate to the processing speed of CPU. The result closer to 3Dmark01 and super pi 32M. T7400 out perform T2600 under same speed even T7400 is 400MHz slower.
3DMark06
HIGHER IS BETTER
1280 X 1024 32Bit
Same thing happens in 3Dmark06 also. But this time T2600 at 3G is better than T7400 at 2.6G, but it is only about 60 point more for 400MHz difference. For their default speed is about 100point difference.
Sandra CPU Arithmetic Benchmark
HIGHER IS BETTER
Now we probably knows why 2.6G T7400 can out perform 3G T2600. T7400 at 2.6G score of ALU and iSSE2 is much faster than T2600 at 3G
Sandra CPU Multi-Media Benchmark
HIGHER IS BETTER
Well, from this we can tell that under multi-media bench, the result is about the same as we see as other benchmarks.
Cinebench CPU Benchmark
HIGHER IS BETTER
Another benchmarks back up our thought, when FSB increases, the gap gets larger between T7400 and T2600! At default speed, only about 9 point different between each. However as FSB and bus speed increases, the Merom like the unleash monster, it gets even 60 points compare with 2.9G T7400 and 3G T2600
F.E.A.R Benchmark*
HIGHER IS BETTER
1152 X 864, FSAA 4X, Anisotropic 16X
FARCRY Benchmark**
HIGHER IS BETTER
1280 X 1024, D3D encode, Antialising 8X, AF 16X
Quake4 Benchmark***
HIGHER IS BETTER
1280 X 1024, Ultra Quality, Anisotropic 16X, Antialising 4X, SMP enable
*F.E.A.R Benchmark using its build in test run
**FarCry Benchmark Downloaded Guru3D (Here)
***Q4 Benchmark Downloaded Guru3D (Here)
