[update HD bench] intel 22nm ivy bridge !2.0G Quad core 跑 DDR3 2133 C6+ @ Gigabyte^^

[coolaler]

看到這顆
所以會重低時脈開始跳??
話說這顆開C1E之類加上高記憶體時脈的穩定性會不會不好啊

C1E只是節能，不會不穩

 

[FlanK3r]

thx Coolaler, maybe tomorow I can test Cinebench and wprime with my 2600k at 2400 MHz

 

[Borc]

thx Coolaler, maybe tomorow I can test Cinebench and wprime with my 2600k at 2400 MHz

He used DDR3-2133 CL6 which makes it pretty hard to reproduce. And most Benchmarks are made with 2,0 Ghz, you may use this frequency instead. But unfortunately with an old Bios.

 

[coolaler]

thx Coolaler, maybe tomorow I can test Cinebench and wprime with my 2600k at 2400 MHz

i5 2300 better

 

[Borc]

I could easily do a comparison with Sandy Bridge 4x2,0 Ghz 6MB L3 but as indicated I have no DDR3-2133 CL6. Makes no sense to me.

 

[coolaler]

I could easily do a comparison with Sandy Bridge 4x2,0 Ghz 6MB L3 but as indicated I have no DDR3-2133 CL6. Makes no sense to me.

I forgot told u,the bench is set on DDR3 1600

 

[Borc]

I forgot told u,the bench is set on DDR3 1600

That makes a difference. What CL mode?

Ok I can give you my results. i5-2500k clocked down to 2,0 Ghz, DDR3-1333-CL9 used (Sandy Bridge standard).

CPUMark 99
Sandy Bridge 2,0 Ghz= 306
Ivy Bridge 2,0 Ghz= 316 +3,3%

Cinebench 11.5
Sandy Bridge 2,0 Ghz= 3,18
Ivy Bridge 2,0 Ghz= 3,35 +5,3%

Fritzchess
Sandy Bridge 2,0 Ghz= 6034
Ivy Bridge 2,0 Ghz= 6182 +2,4%

Wprime 1.55
Sandy Bridge 2,0 Ghz= 16,09
Ivy Bridge 2,0 Ghz= 17,019 -5,8%

The WPrime result looks weird, Ivy bridge shouldn't be slower. Maybe a result of your old Bios or whatsoever. You might recheck your 2,0 Ghz results with the newest available Bios (F11a) for your Board.

 

[coolaler]

That makes a difference. What CL mode?

Ok I can give you my results. i5-2500k clocked down to 2,0 Ghz, DDR3-1333-CL9 used (Sandy Bridge standard).

CPUMark 99
Sandy Bridge 2,0 Ghz= 306
Ivy Bridge 2,0 Ghz= 316 +3,3%

Cinebench 11.5
Sandy Bridge 2,0 Ghz= 3,18
Ivy Bridge 2,0 Ghz= 3,35 +5,3%

Fritzchess
Sandy Bridge 2,0 Ghz= 6034
Ivy Bridge 2,0 Ghz= 6182 +2,4%

Wprime 1.55
Sandy Bridge 2,0 Ghz= 16,09
Ivy Bridge 2,0 Ghz= 17,019 -5,8%

The WPrime result looks weird, Ivy bridge shouldn't be slower. Maybe a result of your old Bios or whatsoever. You might recheck your 2,0 Ghz results with the newest available Bios (F11a) for your Board.

wPrime1.55 Had some bug there(when X79) ,always one thread lag,its why bad scores

 

[Borc]

That's why you should use Wprime 2.0x...version 1.55 is pretty old.

 

[coolaler]

That's why you should use Wprime 2.0x...version 1.55 is pretty old.

OK,test later